Provisional attachment under Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires exhaustion of statutory remedies; impugned order set aside, appeal to tribuna...
Restoration of property under Prevention of Money Laundering Act after attachment dispute rendered academic; possession directed to successful resolut...
Goods Transport Agency services via e commerce portals: consignment note creates custody and liability and enables exemption for unregistered recipien...
Reverse charge and assignment of royalty collection: exemption for excess royalty collectors subject to reconciliation; leaseholders remain liable und...
Admissibility of investigation statements recorded during...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalty.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Admissibility of investigation statements recorded during inquiry is conditional: when statements under section 108 (Customs) are not admissible under the primary clause, they become relevant only if the declarants are examined as witnesses before the adjudicating authority, the authority forms an opinion to admit them, and cross examination is afforded; these procedural safeguards in section 138B(1)(b) (and counterpart section 9D(1)(b) in Central Excise) are mandatory. Failure to comply bars reliance on such statements; accordingly, a penalty imposed solely on an unvalidated section 108 statement was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Admissibility of investigation statements recorded during inquiry is conditional: when statements under section 108 (Customs) are not admissible under the primary clause, they become relevant only if the declarants are examined as witnesses before the adjudicating authority, the authority forms an opinion to admit them, and cross examination is afforded; these procedural safeguards in section 138B(1)(b) (and counterpart section 9D(1)(b) in Central Excise) are mandatory. Failure to comply bars reliance on such statements; accordingly, a penalty imposed solely on an unvalidated section 108 statement was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.