Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tribunal affirmed that issuance of duplicate share certificates without informing the registered shareholder breached the company's duty and violated due diligence obligations of the registrar/transfer agent; consequence: register must be rectified and shares restored to the original shareholder. Tribunal found negligent conduct in issuing duplicates and simultaneous transfer to an impostor, warranting compensation as alternative relief; consequence: damages equivalent to market value of the shares were ordered where restoration failed. Tribunal also awarded litigation costs to compensate the aggrieved individual for legal expenses. Appeal against the rectification and alternative compensation was dismissed.
Tribunal affirmed that issuance of duplicate share certificates without informing the registered shareholder breached the company's duty and violated due diligence obligations of the registrar/transfer agent; consequence: register must be rectified and shares restored to the original shareholder. Tribunal found negligent conduct in issuing duplicates and simultaneous transfer to an impostor, warranting compensation as alternative relief; consequence: damages equivalent to market value of the shares were ordered where restoration failed. Tribunal also awarded litigation costs to compensate the aggrieved individual for legal expenses. Appeal against the rectification and alternative compensation was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.