<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rectification of register and duplicate share certificates affirmed; restoration ordered and market value compensation plus costs awarded</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96847</link>
    <description>Tribunal affirmed that issuance of duplicate share certificates without informing the registered shareholder breached the company&#039;s duty and violated due diligence obligations of the registrar/transfer agent; consequence: register must be rectified and shares restored to the original shareholder. Tribunal found negligent conduct in issuing duplicates and simultaneous transfer to an impostor, warranting compensation as alternative relief; consequence: damages equivalent to market value of the shares were ordered where restoration failed. Tribunal also awarded litigation costs to compensate the aggrieved individual for legal expenses. Appeal against the rectification and alternative compensation was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:09:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:09:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rectification of register and duplicate share certificates affirmed; restoration ordered and market value compensation plus costs awarded</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96847</link>
      <description>Tribunal affirmed that issuance of duplicate share certificates without informing the registered shareholder breached the company&#039;s duty and violated due diligence obligations of the registrar/transfer agent; consequence: register must be rectified and shares restored to the original shareholder. Tribunal found negligent conduct in issuing duplicates and simultaneous transfer to an impostor, warranting compensation as alternative relief; consequence: damages equivalent to market value of the shares were ordered where restoration failed. Tribunal also awarded litigation costs to compensate the aggrieved individual for legal expenses. Appeal against the rectification and alternative compensation was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:09:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>