Allocation of registration charges: contractual clause overriding statutory presumption allowed as deduction against capital gain after unrebutted doc...
Expenditure tied to investments yielding exempt income restricted to attributable costs; broader disallowance disallowed and adjustments to WDV and mi...
Admissibility of Investigative Statements invalidated reliance on coerced emails and valuation redetermination, resulting in set aside of penalties an...
Classification of printed technical documents: specific Chapter 49.01 entry prevails, enabling claimed customs exemptions for imported manuals and rep...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5281 to 5300 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Imported goods cleared and sold as fertilizers did not meet the...
Eligibility for notification exemption on imported fertilizers challenged; penalty, interest and confiscation set aside after voluntary payment and non retroactivity ruling
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Imported goods cleared and sold as fertilizers did not meet the post 2011 exemption condition limiting nil duty to inputs used in fertilizer manufacture; appellants paid the differential countervailing duty and interest voluntarily before show cause, and explained the omission as a bona fide, unintentional mistake. The tribunal found no element of suppression and held that penal provisions enacted later do not apply to the 2011 dispute period; accordingly, invocation of penalty for suppression and confirmation of interest and confiscation were set aside, and the appeal allowed to that extent.
Imported goods cleared and sold as fertilizers did not meet the post 2011 exemption condition limiting nil duty to inputs used in fertilizer manufacture; appellants paid the differential countervailing duty and interest voluntarily before show cause, and explained the omission as a bona fide, unintentional mistake. The tribunal found no element of suppression and held that penal provisions enacted later do not apply to the 2011 dispute period; accordingly, invocation of penalty for suppression and confirmation of interest and confiscation were set aside, and the appeal allowed to that extent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
