<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Eligibility for notification exemption on imported fertilizers challenged; penalty, interest and confiscation set aside after voluntary payment and non retroactivity ruling</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96809</link>
    <description>Imported goods cleared and sold as fertilizers did not meet the post 2011 exemption condition limiting nil duty to inputs used in fertilizer manufacture; appellants paid the differential countervailing duty and interest voluntarily before show cause, and explained the omission as a bona fide, unintentional mistake. The tribunal found no element of suppression and held that penal provisions enacted later do not apply to the 2011 dispute period; accordingly, invocation of penalty for suppression and confirmation of interest and confiscation were set aside, and the appeal allowed to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:03:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:03:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Eligibility for notification exemption on imported fertilizers challenged; penalty, interest and confiscation set aside after voluntary payment and non retroactivity ruling</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96809</link>
      <description>Imported goods cleared and sold as fertilizers did not meet the post 2011 exemption condition limiting nil duty to inputs used in fertilizer manufacture; appellants paid the differential countervailing duty and interest voluntarily before show cause, and explained the omission as a bona fide, unintentional mistake. The tribunal found no element of suppression and held that penal provisions enacted later do not apply to the 2011 dispute period; accordingly, invocation of penalty for suppression and confirmation of interest and confiscation were set aside, and the appeal allowed to that extent.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 09:03:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>