Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Imported goods cleared and sold as fertilizers did not meet the...
Eligibility for notification exemption on imported fertilizers challenged; penalty, interest and confiscation set aside after voluntary payment and non retroactivity ruling
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Imported goods cleared and sold as fertilizers did not meet the post 2011 exemption condition limiting nil duty to inputs used in fertilizer manufacture; appellants paid the differential countervailing duty and interest voluntarily before show cause, and explained the omission as a bona fide, unintentional mistake. The tribunal found no element of suppression and held that penal provisions enacted later do not apply to the 2011 dispute period; accordingly, invocation of penalty for suppression and confirmation of interest and confiscation were set aside, and the appeal allowed to that extent.
Imported goods cleared and sold as fertilizers did not meet the post 2011 exemption condition limiting nil duty to inputs used in fertilizer manufacture; appellants paid the differential countervailing duty and interest voluntarily before show cause, and explained the omission as a bona fide, unintentional mistake. The tribunal found no element of suppression and held that penal provisions enacted later do not apply to the 2011 dispute period; accordingly, invocation of penalty for suppression and confirmation of interest and confiscation were set aside, and the appeal allowed to that extent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
