Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Liability of the deductor arises where tax required to be deducted at source was not deducted or deposited and there is no evidence that the payees paid tax directly; the deductor must produce a prescribed certificate confirming payee payment. Because no such certificate or information about payee payments was found, the tribunal remanded the matter to the assessing officer to examine whether payees paid tax and to reconsider treating the deductor as an assessee in default. An additional ground was allowed for statistical purposes.
Liability of the deductor arises where tax required to be deducted at source was not deducted or deposited and there is no evidence that the payees paid tax directly; the deductor must produce a prescribed certificate confirming payee payment. Because no such certificate or information about payee payments was found, the tribunal remanded the matter to the assessing officer to examine whether payees paid tax and to reconsider treating the deductor as an assessee in default. An additional ground was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.