Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Liability of the deductor arises where tax required to be deducted at source was not deducted or deposited and there is no evidence that the payees paid tax directly; the deductor must produce a prescribed certificate confirming payee payment. Because no such certificate or information about payee payments was found, the tribunal remanded the matter to the assessing officer to examine whether payees paid tax and to reconsider treating the deductor as an assessee in default. An additional ground was allowed for statistical purposes.
Liability of the deductor arises where tax required to be deducted at source was not deducted or deposited and there is no evidence that the payees paid tax directly; the deductor must produce a prescribed certificate confirming payee payment. Because no such certificate or information about payee payments was found, the tribunal remanded the matter to the assessing officer to examine whether payees paid tax and to reconsider treating the deductor as an assessee in default. An additional ground was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
