Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Cross country pipeline classification and ITC entitlement: pipelines outside factory treated as immovable, ITC disallowed under Section 17 restriction...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6181 to 6200 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Recorded statements under section 108 require the statutory...
Admissibility of recorded statements and electronic evidence: CESTAT excludes non compliant statements and email printouts and sets aside revaluation and penalty
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Recorded statements under section 108 require the statutory procedure under section 138B: the witness must be examined before the adjudicating authority, the authority must decide on admissibility, and the person against whom the statement is used must be afforded cross examination - otherwise the statements lack relevance and cannot be relied upon. Electronic records and computer printouts are inadmissible without compliance with section 138C and a certificate; absence of Panchnama and retraction of statements defeats reliance. Consequence: the tribunal set aside the revaluation and penalty and allowed the appeal.
Recorded statements under section 108 require the statutory procedure under section 138B: the witness must be examined before the adjudicating authority, the authority must decide on admissibility, and the person against whom the statement is used must be afforded cross examination - otherwise the statements lack relevance and cannot be relied upon. Electronic records and computer printouts are inadmissible without compliance with section 138C and a certificate; absence of Panchnama and retraction of statements defeats reliance. Consequence: the tribunal set aside the revaluation and penalty and allowed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.