<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Admissibility of recorded statements and electronic evidence: CESTAT excludes non compliant statements and email printouts and sets aside revaluation and penalty</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96749</link>
    <description>Recorded statements under section 108 require the statutory procedure under section 138B: the witness must be examined before the adjudicating authority, the authority must decide on admissibility, and the person against whom the statement is used must be afforded cross examination - otherwise the statements lack relevance and cannot be relied upon. Electronic records and computer printouts are inadmissible without compliance with section 138C and a certificate; absence of Panchnama and retraction of statements defeats reliance. Consequence: the tribunal set aside the revaluation and penalty and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 07:46:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 07:46:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Admissibility of recorded statements and electronic evidence: CESTAT excludes non compliant statements and email printouts and sets aside revaluation and penalty</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96749</link>
      <description>Recorded statements under section 108 require the statutory procedure under section 138B: the witness must be examined before the adjudicating authority, the authority must decide on admissibility, and the person against whom the statement is used must be afforded cross examination - otherwise the statements lack relevance and cannot be relied upon. Electronic records and computer printouts are inadmissible without compliance with section 138C and a certificate; absence of Panchnama and retraction of statements defeats reliance. Consequence: the tribunal set aside the revaluation and penalty and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 07:46:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>