TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
Transfer pricing issue: preference share investment was treated as a disguised loan and recharacterised for TP purposes on substance-over-form grounds; DRP/TPO conclusion was affirmed and interest benchmarked accordingly. Disallowance under exempt-income allocation: the assessee's suo motu ad hoc apportionment of employee and overhead costs was rejected as unsupported. Interest disallowance against investments was denied where interest free funds exceeded investments; administrative disallowance to be recomputed per relevant precedent. An additional ground on cost attribution for captive steam was refused; AO correctly attributed full plant cost to electricity, eliminating the 80 IA deduction. Interest deduction for acquisition of control denied for lack of nexus; alternative claim against dividend income rejected. Matters on post retirement medical provision and in house R&D expenditure restored to AO for factual examination; AO directed to consider rectification for foreign tax credit.
Transfer pricing issue: preference share investment was treated as a disguised loan and recharacterised for TP purposes on substance-over-form grounds; DRP/TPO conclusion was affirmed and interest benchmarked accordingly. Disallowance under exempt-income allocation: the assessee's suo motu ad hoc apportionment of employee and overhead costs was rejected as unsupported. Interest disallowance against investments was denied where interest free funds exceeded investments; administrative disallowance to be recomputed per relevant precedent. An additional ground on cost attribution for captive steam was refused; AO correctly attributed full plant cost to electricity, eliminating the 80 IA deduction. Interest deduction for acquisition of control denied for lack of nexus; alternative claim against dividend income rejected. Matters on post retirement medical provision and in house R&D expenditure restored to AO for factual examination; AO directed to consider rectification for foreign tax credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
