<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Preference share investment recharacterised as loan for transfer pricing, DRP/TPO action affirmed and interest benchmarked.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96685</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing issue: preference share investment was treated as a disguised loan and recharacterised for TP purposes on substance-over-form grounds; DRP/TPO conclusion was affirmed and interest benchmarked accordingly. Disallowance under exempt-income allocation: the assessee&#039;s suo motu ad hoc apportionment of employee and overhead costs was rejected as unsupported. Interest disallowance against investments was denied where interest free funds exceeded investments; administrative disallowance to be recomputed per relevant precedent. An additional ground on cost attribution for captive steam was refused; AO correctly attributed full plant cost to electricity, eliminating the 80 IA deduction. Interest deduction for acquisition of control d.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 17:54:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 17:54:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Preference share investment recharacterised as loan for transfer pricing, DRP/TPO action affirmed and interest benchmarked.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96685</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing issue: preference share investment was treated as a disguised loan and recharacterised for TP purposes on substance-over-form grounds; DRP/TPO conclusion was affirmed and interest benchmarked accordingly. Disallowance under exempt-income allocation: the assessee&#039;s suo motu ad hoc apportionment of employee and overhead costs was rejected as unsupported. Interest disallowance against investments was denied where interest free funds exceeded investments; administrative disallowance to be recomputed per relevant precedent. An additional ground on cost attribution for captive steam was refused; AO correctly attributed full plant cost to electricity, eliminating the 80 IA deduction. Interest deduction for acquisition of control d.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 17:54:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>