Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Principal Commissioner's transfer of the assessee's PAN and associated 'case' to the Central charge carried all powers over the PAN, including power to cancel registration; therefore PCIT(C) had jurisdiction to cancel registration for prior and subsequent years. Cancellation under registration provisions was upheld on merits: the trust's recorded activities were non genuine and deviated from its objects by funding profit entities, promoting partisan content, and making payments without evidence of services, amounting to specified violations; such use of funds defeats charitable application and justifies loss of exemption. The appeal against cancellation is dismissed.
Principal Commissioner's transfer of the assessee's PAN and associated 'case' to the Central charge carried all powers over the PAN, including power to cancel registration; therefore PCIT(C) had jurisdiction to cancel registration for prior and subsequent years. Cancellation under registration provisions was upheld on merits: the trust's recorded activities were non genuine and deviated from its objects by funding profit entities, promoting partisan content, and making payments without evidence of services, amounting to specified violations; such use of funds defeats charitable application and justifies loss of exemption. The appeal against cancellation is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.