<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Registration cancellation of charitable trust affirmed after PAN transfer; jurisdiction and non genuineness findings sustain loss of exemption.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96682</link>
    <description>Principal Commissioner&#039;s transfer of the assessee&#039;s PAN and associated &#039;case&#039; to the Central charge carried all powers over the PAN, including power to cancel registration; therefore PCIT(C) had jurisdiction to cancel registration for prior and subsequent years. Cancellation under registration provisions was upheld on merits: the trust&#039;s recorded activities were non genuine and deviated from its objects by funding profit entities, promoting partisan content, and making payments without evidence of services, amounting to specified violations; such use of funds defeats charitable application and justifies loss of exemption. The appeal against cancellation is dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 17:50:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 17:50:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Registration cancellation of charitable trust affirmed after PAN transfer; jurisdiction and non genuineness findings sustain loss of exemption.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96682</link>
      <description>Principal Commissioner&#039;s transfer of the assessee&#039;s PAN and associated &#039;case&#039; to the Central charge carried all powers over the PAN, including power to cancel registration; therefore PCIT(C) had jurisdiction to cancel registration for prior and subsequent years. Cancellation under registration provisions was upheld on merits: the trust&#039;s recorded activities were non genuine and deviated from its objects by funding profit entities, promoting partisan content, and making payments without evidence of services, amounting to specified violations; such use of funds defeats charitable application and justifies loss of exemption. The appeal against cancellation is dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 17:50:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>