Admissibility of recorded statements and electronic evidence: CESTAT excludes non compliant statements and email printouts and sets aside revaluation ...
Principal Commissioner's transfer of the assessee's PAN and associated 'case' to the Central charge carried all powers over the PAN, including power to cancel registration; therefore PCIT(C) had jurisdiction to cancel registration for prior and subsequent years. Cancellation under registration provisions was upheld on merits: the trust's recorded activities were non genuine and deviated from its objects by funding profit entities, promoting partisan content, and making payments without evidence of services, amounting to specified violations; such use of funds defeats charitable application and justifies loss of exemption. The appeal against cancellation is dismissed.
Principal Commissioner's transfer of the assessee's PAN and associated 'case' to the Central charge carried all powers over the PAN, including power to cancel registration; therefore PCIT(C) had jurisdiction to cancel registration for prior and subsequent years. Cancellation under registration provisions was upheld on merits: the trust's recorded activities were non genuine and deviated from its objects by funding profit entities, promoting partisan content, and making payments without evidence of services, amounting to specified violations; such use of funds defeats charitable application and justifies loss of exemption. The appeal against cancellation is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.