Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Revenue sharing arrangements structured on a principal to principal basis for healthcare business support and infrastructural services do not attract service tax under the business support services classification; the reasoning relies on prior tribunal and departmental appellate findings and Circular No.109/03/2009 ST treating principal to principal transactions as not constituting a service, and identical tribunal decisions on comparable agreements. Because the department did not appeal earlier favorable orders, those orders attained finality and the impugned demand was set aside; the appeal was allowed with consequential relief as per law.
Revenue sharing arrangements structured on a principal to principal basis for healthcare business support and infrastructural services do not attract service tax under the business support services classification; the reasoning relies on prior tribunal and departmental appellate findings and Circular No.109/03/2009 ST treating principal to principal transactions as not constituting a service, and identical tribunal decisions on comparable agreements. Because the department did not appeal earlier favorable orders, those orders attained finality and the impugned demand was set aside; the appeal was allowed with consequential relief as per law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
