<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue sharing arrangements on principal to principal basis in healthcare BSS found not taxable, impugned demand set aside.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96673</link>
    <description>Revenue sharing arrangements structured on a principal to principal basis for healthcare business support and infrastructural services do not attract service tax under the business support services classification; the reasoning relies on prior tribunal and departmental appellate findings and Circular No.109/03/2009 ST treating principal to principal transactions as not constituting a service, and identical tribunal decisions on comparable agreements. Because the department did not appeal earlier favorable orders, those orders attained finality and the impugned demand was set aside; the appeal was allowed with consequential relief as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 17:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 17:27:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue sharing arrangements on principal to principal basis in healthcare BSS found not taxable, impugned demand set aside.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96673</link>
      <description>Revenue sharing arrangements structured on a principal to principal basis for healthcare business support and infrastructural services do not attract service tax under the business support services classification; the reasoning relies on prior tribunal and departmental appellate findings and Circular No.109/03/2009 ST treating principal to principal transactions as not constituting a service, and identical tribunal decisions on comparable agreements. Because the department did not appeal earlier favorable orders, those orders attained finality and the impugned demand was set aside; the appeal was allowed with consequential relief as per law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 17:27:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>