Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Revenue sharing arrangements structured on a principal to principal basis for healthcare business support and infrastructural services do not attract service tax under the business support services classification; the reasoning relies on prior tribunal and departmental appellate findings and Circular No.109/03/2009 ST treating principal to principal transactions as not constituting a service, and identical tribunal decisions on comparable agreements. Because the department did not appeal earlier favorable orders, those orders attained finality and the impugned demand was set aside; the appeal was allowed with consequential relief as per law.
Revenue sharing arrangements structured on a principal to principal basis for healthcare business support and infrastructural services do not attract service tax under the business support services classification; the reasoning relies on prior tribunal and departmental appellate findings and Circular No.109/03/2009 ST treating principal to principal transactions as not constituting a service, and identical tribunal decisions on comparable agreements. Because the department did not appeal earlier favorable orders, those orders attained finality and the impugned demand was set aside; the appeal was allowed with consequential relief as per law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
