Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Moratorium under the insolvency code does not extend to the personal guarantor's secured property; SARFAESI action against a guarantor may proceed despite a moratorium declared for the corporate debtor, and this view aligns with Supreme Court precedent. Separately, an appeal under the Contempt of Courts Act is maintainable only from an order imposing punishment for contempt; a contempt petition dismissed in limine is not an exercise of punitive contempt jurisdiction and therefore is not appealable under Section 19. Applying these principles, the appellate tribunal found the contempt appeal not maintainable and dismissed it.
Moratorium under the insolvency code does not extend to the personal guarantor's secured property; SARFAESI action against a guarantor may proceed despite a moratorium declared for the corporate debtor, and this view aligns with Supreme Court precedent. Separately, an appeal under the Contempt of Courts Act is maintainable only from an order imposing punishment for contempt; a contempt petition dismissed in limine is not an exercise of punitive contempt jurisdiction and therefore is not appealable under Section 19. Applying these principles, the appellate tribunal found the contempt appeal not maintainable and dismissed it.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.