Contempt appealability under Section 19 is limited to punishment orders; dismissal in limine is not appealable as of right.

An appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 lies only from an order passed in the exercise of jurisdiction to punish for contempt. An order that merely declines to initiate contempt proceedings, or dismisses a contempt application in limine without imposing punishment, is not an appealable punitive order because it does not determine contempt on merits or result in punishment. On that basis, the NCLAT noted that a dismissal in limine of a contempt application does not attract the statutory appeal right under Section 19, and the appeal was not maintainable.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether an appeal was maintainable against the order dismissing the contempt application in limine.

Issue (i): Whether an appeal was maintainable against the order dismissing the contempt application in limine.

Analysis: Appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 lies only from an order passed in exercise of jurisdiction to punish for contempt. An order declining to initiate, dismissing, or otherwise rejecting contempt proceedings without imposing punishment is not an order made in the exercise of such punitive jurisdiction. The authorities relied upon reaffirm that only an order imposing punishment for contempt is appealable as of right, while a dismissal in limine of a contempt application does not answer any contention on merits of contempt so as to attract Section 19.

Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable and was liable to be dismissed.

---