Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Applicability of Circular No.224/18/2024-GST para 6 turns on two preconditions: deposit of the pre-deposit contemplated under Section 112 and provision of an undertaking/intimation to the proper appellate authority. The court accepted that the taxpayer furnished the required intimation and, in the peculiar facts, treated that intimation as sufficient for para 6; accordingly the revenue was directed to refund amounts recovered under the summary demand after withholding the pre-deposit amount as contemplated under Section 112. The taxpayer forewent any claim to interest on the refunded amount.
Applicability of Circular No.224/18/2024-GST para 6 turns on two preconditions: deposit of the pre-deposit contemplated under Section 112 and provision of an undertaking/intimation to the proper appellate authority. The court accepted that the taxpayer furnished the required intimation and, in the peculiar facts, treated that intimation as sufficient for para 6; accordingly the revenue was directed to refund amounts recovered under the summary demand after withholding the pre-deposit amount as contemplated under Section 112. The taxpayer forewent any claim to interest on the refunded amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
