Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to refund of the amount recovered pursuant to the summary of demand (AnnexureC) in view of para 6 of Circular No. 224/18/2024-GST, having furnished an intimation/undertaking to file appeal (AnnexureD) and subject to retention of the predeposit amount under Section 112 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Analysis: Para 6 of the circular provides that where a taxpayer furnishes an undertaking to file an appeal, recovery proceedings ought not to be initiated; however, the benefit is conditioned on deposit of the predeposit amount or provision of the undertaking/declaration to the proper officer. The petitioner furnished an intimation to the appellate authority within seven days (AnnexureD) and, for the present, agreed that the predeposit amount may be withheld by the revenue. The respondent contested applicability of the circular on grounds that the declaration was not made to the proper officer and that predeposit was not paid. Having regard to the factual record, AnnexureD, and the petitioner's concession to forego the predeposit and interest, it is appropriate in the peculiar facts of the case to treat AnnexureD as sufficient for para 6 and to direct refund of amounts recovered after withholding the predeposit amount.
Conclusion: The petitioner is entitled to refund of the amount recovered pursuant to the summary of demand (AnnexureC) after withholding the predeposit amount as contemplated under Section 112 of the CGST Act, 2017; the petitioner foregoes any claim to interest on the refunded amount.