Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Applicability of Circular No.224/18/2024-GST para 6 turns on two preconditions: deposit of the pre-deposit contemplated under Section 112 and provision of an undertaking/intimation to the proper appellate authority. The court accepted that the taxpayer furnished the required intimation and, in the peculiar facts, treated that intimation as sufficient for para 6; accordingly the revenue was directed to refund amounts recovered under the summary demand after withholding the pre-deposit amount as contemplated under Section 112. The taxpayer forewent any claim to interest on the refunded amount.
Applicability of Circular No.224/18/2024-GST para 6 turns on two preconditions: deposit of the pre-deposit contemplated under Section 112 and provision of an undertaking/intimation to the proper appellate authority. The court accepted that the taxpayer furnished the required intimation and, in the peculiar facts, treated that intimation as sufficient for para 6; accordingly the revenue was directed to refund amounts recovered under the summary demand after withholding the pre-deposit amount as contemplated under Section 112. The taxpayer forewent any claim to interest on the refunded amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
