Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Applicability of Circular No.224/18/2024-GST para 6 turns on two preconditions: deposit of the pre-deposit contemplated under Section 112 and provision of an undertaking/intimation to the proper appellate authority. The court accepted that the taxpayer furnished the required intimation and, in the peculiar facts, treated that intimation as sufficient for para 6; accordingly the revenue was directed to refund amounts recovered under the summary demand after withholding the pre-deposit amount as contemplated under Section 112. The taxpayer forewent any claim to interest on the refunded amount.
Applicability of Circular No.224/18/2024-GST para 6 turns on two preconditions: deposit of the pre-deposit contemplated under Section 112 and provision of an undertaking/intimation to the proper appellate authority. The court accepted that the taxpayer furnished the required intimation and, in the peculiar facts, treated that intimation as sufficient for para 6; accordingly the revenue was directed to refund amounts recovered under the summary demand after withholding the pre-deposit amount as contemplated under Section 112. The taxpayer forewent any claim to interest on the refunded amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
