Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Classification of imported natural rubber latex under tariff headings must follow the General Rules for Interpretation; where headings and notes permit divergent legal interpretation, revenue bears the burden to prove misclassification. Post-clearance audit and ACP/AEO facilitation require authorities to produce cogent evidence before alleging misconduct; wilful misstatement demands proof of a positive act and intent. Because the departmental challenge could reflect a genuine divergence of view and no negative intention was established, the show-cause notice was held time-barred and the impugned demand was set aside, with consequential relief permitted.
Classification of imported natural rubber latex under tariff headings must follow the General Rules for Interpretation; where headings and notes permit divergent legal interpretation, revenue bears the burden to prove misclassification. Post-clearance audit and ACP/AEO facilitation require authorities to produce cogent evidence before alleging misconduct; wilful misstatement demands proof of a positive act and intent. Because the departmental challenge could reflect a genuine divergence of view and no negative intention was established, the show-cause notice was held time-barred and the impugned demand was set aside, with consequential relief permitted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.