<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Classification of imported natural rubber latex: time-bar found, departmental demand set aside and appeals allowed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96594</link>
    <description>Classification of imported natural rubber latex under tariff headings must follow the General Rules for Interpretation; where headings and notes permit divergent legal interpretation, revenue bears the burden to prove misclassification. Post-clearance audit and ACP/AEO facilitation require authorities to produce cogent evidence before alleging misconduct; wilful misstatement demands proof of a positive act and intent. Because the departmental challenge could reflect a genuine divergence of view and no negative intention was established, the show-cause notice was held time-barred and the impugned demand was set aside, with consequential relief permitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:24:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:24:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=884042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Classification of imported natural rubber latex: time-bar found, departmental demand set aside and appeals allowed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96594</link>
      <description>Classification of imported natural rubber latex under tariff headings must follow the General Rules for Interpretation; where headings and notes permit divergent legal interpretation, revenue bears the burden to prove misclassification. Post-clearance audit and ACP/AEO facilitation require authorities to produce cogent evidence before alleging misconduct; wilful misstatement demands proof of a positive act and intent. Because the departmental challenge could reflect a genuine divergence of view and no negative intention was established, the show-cause notice was held time-barred and the impugned demand was set aside, with consequential relief permitted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 08:24:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>