Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7241 to 7260 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Financial creditor's insolvency petition under Section 7 was...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution framework
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Financial creditor's insolvency petition under Section 7 was based on admitted debt and default, supported by multiple OTS proposals; the Adjudicating Authority found the initiation not mala fide or fraudulent and rejected the corporate debtor's challenge under Section 65, leaving admission and IRP appointment intact. The tribunal affirmed that the financial creditor was entitled to proceed under the IBC when debt and default exist. With the CoC constituted, settlement proposals must now be considered within the resolution framework and the parties remain entitled to pursue a one-time settlement or the Swiss challenge route and to take steps under the resolution process applicable post-CoC formation.
Financial creditor's insolvency petition under Section 7 was based on admitted debt and default, supported by multiple OTS proposals; the Adjudicating Authority found the initiation not mala fide or fraudulent and rejected the corporate debtor's challenge under Section 65, leaving admission and IRP appointment intact. The tribunal affirmed that the financial creditor was entitled to proceed under the IBC when debt and default exist. With the CoC constituted, settlement proposals must now be considered within the resolution framework and the parties remain entitled to pursue a one-time settlement or the Swiss challenge route and to take steps under the resolution process applicable post-CoC formation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.