Tax determination against deceased proprietor invalid where no notice to legal representative; appeal rejected without addressing jurisdictional defec...
Revocation of GST registration and permission to file blocked returns; conditional defreezing of bank accounts after security and instalment applicati...
Right to access seized electronic evidence: impugned adjudication treated as additional show cause notice, remand for fresh hearing and return of mate...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6381 to 6400 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Financial creditor's insolvency petition under Section 7 was...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution framework
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Financial creditor's insolvency petition under Section 7 was based on admitted debt and default, supported by multiple OTS proposals; the Adjudicating Authority found the initiation not mala fide or fraudulent and rejected the corporate debtor's challenge under Section 65, leaving admission and IRP appointment intact. The tribunal affirmed that the financial creditor was entitled to proceed under the IBC when debt and default exist. With the CoC constituted, settlement proposals must now be considered within the resolution framework and the parties remain entitled to pursue a one-time settlement or the Swiss challenge route and to take steps under the resolution process applicable post-CoC formation.
Financial creditor's insolvency petition under Section 7 was based on admitted debt and default, supported by multiple OTS proposals; the Adjudicating Authority found the initiation not mala fide or fraudulent and rejected the corporate debtor's challenge under Section 65, leaving admission and IRP appointment intact. The tribunal affirmed that the financial creditor was entitled to proceed under the IBC when debt and default exist. With the CoC constituted, settlement proposals must now be considered within the resolution framework and the parties remain entitled to pursue a one-time settlement or the Swiss challenge route and to take steps under the resolution process applicable post-CoC formation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.