Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
Business reorganisation requires recognition of successor's modified return; draft orders against dissolved transferor quashed and fresh review direct...
Pre-commencement R&D deduction denied where business had not commenced; deeming benefit requires tangible start of manufacture or commercial exploitat...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5541 to 5560 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Financial creditor's insolvency petition under Section 7 was...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution framework
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Financial creditor's insolvency petition under Section 7 was based on admitted debt and default, supported by multiple OTS proposals; the Adjudicating Authority found the initiation not mala fide or fraudulent and rejected the corporate debtor's challenge under Section 65, leaving admission and IRP appointment intact. The tribunal affirmed that the financial creditor was entitled to proceed under the IBC when debt and default exist. With the CoC constituted, settlement proposals must now be considered within the resolution framework and the parties remain entitled to pursue a one-time settlement or the Swiss challenge route and to take steps under the resolution process applicable post-CoC formation.
Financial creditor's insolvency petition under Section 7 was based on admitted debt and default, supported by multiple OTS proposals; the Adjudicating Authority found the initiation not mala fide or fraudulent and rejected the corporate debtor's challenge under Section 65, leaving admission and IRP appointment intact. The tribunal affirmed that the financial creditor was entitled to proceed under the IBC when debt and default exist. With the CoC constituted, settlement proposals must now be considered within the resolution framework and the parties remain entitled to pursue a one-time settlement or the Swiss challenge route and to take steps under the resolution process applicable post-CoC formation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.