Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
761 to 780 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Failure to consider statutory GST return forms and portal records was held to be a material legal defect; because the appellate authority did not address figures available in GSTR-1, GSTR-9 and GSTR-3B, its omission constituted an abdication of duty and that appellate order was set aside. The adjudicating authority likewise failed to consider the same return records; that adjudication order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh merits adjudication, with an express right to hearing. Consequentially, no recovery may proceed on the vacated orders and time exclusion for limitation was recorded.
Failure to consider statutory GST return forms and portal records was held to be a material legal defect; because the appellate authority did not address figures available in GSTR-1, GSTR-9 and GSTR-3B, its omission constituted an abdication of duty and that appellate order was set aside. The adjudicating authority likewise failed to consider the same return records; that adjudication order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh merits adjudication, with an express right to hearing. Consequentially, no recovery may proceed on the vacated orders and time exclusion for limitation was recorded.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
