Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate order dated 28th March, 2025 and the adjudication order dated 16th January, 2024 should be set aside for failure to consider the petitioners statutory return records (GSTR-3B, GSTR-9, GSTR-1) available on the GST portal and whether the matter should be remitted for fresh adjudication after affording opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The Court examined the availability of figures and records on the GST portal (GSTR-3B, GSTR-9 and GSTR-1) which, according to the petitioner, demonstrated that the input tax credit requiring reversal had already been reversed and that the appellate authoritys order did not discuss or deal with those return figures. The Court noted that the appellate order extracts the petitioners grounds but does not address or analyse the portal data or the submissions relating thereto. The Court further observed that the adjudicating authority similarly did not consider the statutory return records while passing the adjudication order, resulting in an ex parte adjudication. Given that the material relied upon by the petitioner was available on the portal and that neither the adjudicating authority nor the Appellate Authority recorded reasons addressing that material, the Court found a failure to discharge the duty to consider relevant statutory records and to afford the petitioner an effective hearing.
Conclusion: The appellate order dated 28th March, 2025 and the adjudication order dated 16th January, 2024 are set aside for failure to consider the statutory return records and for not affording appropriate consideration and hearing; the matter is remanded to the Adjudicating Authority/Proper Officer for fresh decision on merits after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing and considering any written note or reply filed by the petitioner.