Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Failure to consider statutory GST return forms and portal records was held to be a material legal defect; because the appellate authority did not address figures available in GSTR-1, GSTR-9 and GSTR-3B, its omission constituted an abdication of duty and that appellate order was set aside. The adjudicating authority likewise failed to consider the same return records; that adjudication order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh merits adjudication, with an express right to hearing. Consequentially, no recovery may proceed on the vacated orders and time exclusion for limitation was recorded.
Failure to consider statutory GST return forms and portal records was held to be a material legal defect; because the appellate authority did not address figures available in GSTR-1, GSTR-9 and GSTR-3B, its omission constituted an abdication of duty and that appellate order was set aside. The adjudicating authority likewise failed to consider the same return records; that adjudication order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh merits adjudication, with an express right to hearing. Consequentially, no recovery may proceed on the vacated orders and time exclusion for limitation was recorded.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
