Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
Business reorganisation requires recognition of successor's modified return; draft orders against dissolved transferor quashed and fresh review direct...
Respondent failed to pass on the benefit of reduced GST rates for cinema admission tickets by raising base prices and keeping the same cum-tax ticket prices; consequence: DGAP found profiteering of Rs. 2,50,148.39. DGAP investigation, supported by documents submitted by the respondent and a written confirmation admitting non-reduction of specific ticket slabs, formed the factual basis; consequence: those admissions were treated as establishing liability. The statutory rate reductions applicable to tickets of Rs.100 or less (18% to 12%) and above Rs.100 (28% to 18%) created an obligation to reduce prices or otherwise pass the benefit; consequence: DGAP report was accepted and respondent held to have profiteered.
Respondent failed to pass on the benefit of reduced GST rates for cinema admission tickets by raising base prices and keeping the same cum-tax ticket prices; consequence: DGAP found profiteering of Rs. 2,50,148.39. DGAP investigation, supported by documents submitted by the respondent and a written confirmation admitting non-reduction of specific ticket slabs, formed the factual basis; consequence: those admissions were treated as establishing liability. The statutory rate reductions applicable to tickets of Rs.100 or less (18% to 12%) and above Rs.100 (28% to 18%) created an obligation to reduce prices or otherwise pass the benefit; consequence: DGAP report was accepted and respondent held to have profiteered.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
