Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Respondent failed to pass on the benefit of reduced GST rates for cinema admission tickets by raising base prices and keeping the same cum-tax ticket prices; consequence: DGAP found profiteering of Rs. 2,50,148.39. DGAP investigation, supported by documents submitted by the respondent and a written confirmation admitting non-reduction of specific ticket slabs, formed the factual basis; consequence: those admissions were treated as establishing liability. The statutory rate reductions applicable to tickets of Rs.100 or less (18% to 12%) and above Rs.100 (28% to 18%) created an obligation to reduce prices or otherwise pass the benefit; consequence: DGAP report was accepted and respondent held to have profiteered.
Respondent failed to pass on the benefit of reduced GST rates for cinema admission tickets by raising base prices and keeping the same cum-tax ticket prices; consequence: DGAP found profiteering of Rs. 2,50,148.39. DGAP investigation, supported by documents submitted by the respondent and a written confirmation admitting non-reduction of specific ticket slabs, formed the factual basis; consequence: those admissions were treated as establishing liability. The statutory rate reductions applicable to tickets of Rs.100 or less (18% to 12%) and above Rs.100 (28% to 18%) created an obligation to reduce prices or otherwise pass the benefit; consequence: DGAP report was accepted and respondent held to have profiteered.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
