Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
Misclassification between copra and dry coconut: customs recovery and re-valuation quashed for lack of prior licensing-authority invalidation, appeals...
Protective assessment cannot co-exist where substantive additions on the same income are sustained in the hands of the correct assessee; the tribunal found the assessing officer had identified and made substantive additions in the partners' hands which were affirmed on appeal, and therefore the protective addition against the partnership firm must be deleted because permitting both would tax the same income twice. The protective assessment is a temporary revenue-protection measure and loses relevance once the real assessee is determined and income is substantively assessed in that persons hands. The appeal was allowed and the protective addition deleted.
Protective assessment cannot co-exist where substantive additions on the same income are sustained in the hands of the correct assessee; the tribunal found the assessing officer had identified and made substantive additions in the partners' hands which were affirmed on appeal, and therefore the protective addition against the partnership firm must be deleted because permitting both would tax the same income twice. The protective assessment is a temporary revenue-protection measure and loses relevance once the real assessee is determined and income is substantively assessed in that persons hands. The appeal was allowed and the protective addition deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.