Imported analyser diagnostic cartridges treated as accessories with analyser system, not standalone diagnostic reagents; extended limitation and penal...
Steel-timber construction shuttering/formwork tariff classification dispute: essential character held steel, classified as shuttering under Heading 73...
Family-linked property purchases using fabricated loan agreements and benami-style arrangements held to be crime proceeds; attachment upheld, appeal d...
Wrongful availment or misapplication of input tax credit by adjustment between tax heads does not, by itself, attract recovery proceedings if no tax remains unpaid or there is no revenue loss; the tribunal reasoned that proceedings for recovery require tax to be unpaid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax to be wrongfully availed or utilized causing revenue loss, and that mere head-to-head adjustment without loss will not support initiation of recovery notices. The impugned recovery notice was quashed applying these principles.
Wrongful availment or misapplication of input tax credit by adjustment between tax heads does not, by itself, attract recovery proceedings if no tax remains unpaid or there is no revenue loss; the tribunal reasoned that proceedings for recovery require tax to be unpaid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax to be wrongfully availed or utilized causing revenue loss, and that mere head-to-head adjustment without loss will not support initiation of recovery notices. The impugned recovery notice was quashed applying these principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
