Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Wrongful availment or misapplication of input tax credit by adjustment between tax heads does not, by itself, attract recovery proceedings if no tax remains unpaid or there is no revenue loss; the tribunal reasoned that proceedings for recovery require tax to be unpaid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax to be wrongfully availed or utilized causing revenue loss, and that mere head-to-head adjustment without loss will not support initiation of recovery notices. The impugned recovery notice was quashed applying these principles.
Wrongful availment or misapplication of input tax credit by adjustment between tax heads does not, by itself, attract recovery proceedings if no tax remains unpaid or there is no revenue loss; the tribunal reasoned that proceedings for recovery require tax to be unpaid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax to be wrongfully availed or utilized causing revenue loss, and that mere head-to-head adjustment without loss will not support initiation of recovery notices. The impugned recovery notice was quashed applying these principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
