Proceeds of crime and money laundering: PMLA prosecution requires subsisting predicate offence; discharge of predicate accused precludes further prose...
Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Wrongful availment or misapplication of input tax credit by adjustment between tax heads does not, by itself, attract recovery proceedings if no tax remains unpaid or there is no revenue loss; the tribunal reasoned that proceedings for recovery require tax to be unpaid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax to be wrongfully availed or utilized causing revenue loss, and that mere head-to-head adjustment without loss will not support initiation of recovery notices. The impugned recovery notice was quashed applying these principles.
Wrongful availment or misapplication of input tax credit by adjustment between tax heads does not, by itself, attract recovery proceedings if no tax remains unpaid or there is no revenue loss; the tribunal reasoned that proceedings for recovery require tax to be unpaid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax to be wrongfully availed or utilized causing revenue loss, and that mere head-to-head adjustment without loss will not support initiation of recovery notices. The impugned recovery notice was quashed applying these principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
