Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Wrongful availment or misapplication of input tax credit by adjustment between tax heads does not, by itself, attract recovery proceedings if no tax remains unpaid or there is no revenue loss; the tribunal reasoned that proceedings for recovery require tax to be unpaid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax to be wrongfully availed or utilized causing revenue loss, and that mere head-to-head adjustment without loss will not support initiation of recovery notices. The impugned recovery notice was quashed applying these principles.
Wrongful availment or misapplication of input tax credit by adjustment between tax heads does not, by itself, attract recovery proceedings if no tax remains unpaid or there is no revenue loss; the tribunal reasoned that proceedings for recovery require tax to be unpaid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax to be wrongfully availed or utilized causing revenue loss, and that mere head-to-head adjustment without loss will not support initiation of recovery notices. The impugned recovery notice was quashed applying these principles.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
