Proceeds of crime and money laundering: PMLA prosecution requires subsisting predicate offence; discharge of predicate accused precludes further prose...
Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Interplay between limitation for passing final assessment under section 144C(13) and section 153 is examined; the analysis applies the principle that provisions are to be read together where they are inter-dependent and overlapping, particularly regarding transfer pricing related provisions, and therefore the applicable limitation period must be determined with reference to section 144C read with section 153; consequence: final assessment orders issued beyond that combined limitation period are jurisdictionally infirm and were quashed following the precedent relied upon.
Interplay between limitation for passing final assessment under section 144C(13) and section 153 is examined; the analysis applies the principle that provisions are to be read together where they are inter-dependent and overlapping, particularly regarding transfer pricing related provisions, and therefore the applicable limitation period must be determined with reference to section 144C read with section 153; consequence: final assessment orders issued beyond that combined limitation period are jurisdictionally infirm and were quashed following the precedent relied upon.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
