Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Interplay between limitation for passing final assessment under section 144C(13) and section 153 is examined; the analysis applies the principle that provisions are to be read together where they are inter-dependent and overlapping, particularly regarding transfer pricing related provisions, and therefore the applicable limitation period must be determined with reference to section 144C read with section 153; consequence: final assessment orders issued beyond that combined limitation period are jurisdictionally infirm and were quashed following the precedent relied upon.
Interplay between limitation for passing final assessment under section 144C(13) and section 153 is examined; the analysis applies the principle that provisions are to be read together where they are inter-dependent and overlapping, particularly regarding transfer pricing related provisions, and therefore the applicable limitation period must be determined with reference to section 144C read with section 153; consequence: final assessment orders issued beyond that combined limitation period are jurisdictionally infirm and were quashed following the precedent relied upon.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
