Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Approval of a scheme of arrangement was sustained where creditor majorities in value and number approved the compromise; the challenger lacked the statutory voting threshold and therefore had no locus to contest the scheme, resulting in dismissal of the appeal. The tribunal reasoned that a duly sanctioned compromise is binding on all stakeholders under the Companies Act, and the scheme limited entitlements to a defined class of creditors without purporting to exercise criminal or civil court powers; accordingly statutory rights under other Acts were not displaced. Prior authority supporting threshold-based locus and examination of MPID-related concerns were noted but did not alter the result.
Approval of a scheme of arrangement was sustained where creditor majorities in value and number approved the compromise; the challenger lacked the statutory voting threshold and therefore had no locus to contest the scheme, resulting in dismissal of the appeal. The tribunal reasoned that a duly sanctioned compromise is binding on all stakeholders under the Companies Act, and the scheme limited entitlements to a defined class of creditors without purporting to exercise criminal or civil court powers; accordingly statutory rights under other Acts were not displaced. Prior authority supporting threshold-based locus and examination of MPID-related concerns were noted but did not alter the result.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.