<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Scheme of Arrangement approval upheld after creditor majorities; dissenting minority lacked voting threshold so appeal dismissed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96318</link>
    <description>Approval of a scheme of arrangement was sustained where creditor majorities in value and number approved the compromise; the challenger lacked the statutory voting threshold and therefore had no locus to contest the scheme, resulting in dismissal of the appeal. The tribunal reasoned that a duly sanctioned compromise is binding on all stakeholders under the Companies Act, and the scheme limited entitlements to a defined class of creditors without purporting to exercise criminal or civil court powers; accordingly statutory rights under other Acts were not displaced. Prior authority supporting threshold-based locus and examination of MPID-related concerns were noted but did not alter the result.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 13:16:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 13:16:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=881115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Scheme of Arrangement approval upheld after creditor majorities; dissenting minority lacked voting threshold so appeal dismissed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96318</link>
      <description>Approval of a scheme of arrangement was sustained where creditor majorities in value and number approved the compromise; the challenger lacked the statutory voting threshold and therefore had no locus to contest the scheme, resulting in dismissal of the appeal. The tribunal reasoned that a duly sanctioned compromise is binding on all stakeholders under the Companies Act, and the scheme limited entitlements to a defined class of creditors without purporting to exercise criminal or civil court powers; accordingly statutory rights under other Acts were not displaced. Prior authority supporting threshold-based locus and examination of MPID-related concerns were noted but did not alter the result.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 13:16:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>