Pecuniary jurisdiction is inapplicable to search assessments...
Pecuniary jurisdiction in search assessments clarified; Assistant/Deputy Commissioner empowered and search-based additions upheld where incriminating material exists.
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Pecuniary jurisdiction is inapplicable to search assessments because such assessments are not assigned by pecuniary limits; the lowest authority competent to complete a search assessment is the Assistant or Deputy Commissioner, and jurisdictional objections were rejected. Where incriminating material was found during search, additions based on that material are sustainable; a contrary rule for unabated assessments without incriminating material was distinguished. Treating on-money as part of sales requires adding only the profit element rather than entire gross receipts. A provision for interest on delayed service tax was held compensatory, not contingent. Admissions of bogus purchases shift primary onus to assessee, and a single foreign comparable failed as a reliable CUP for CCD interest, supporting an ALP adjustment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.