Cash routed to non-existent firm deemed proceeds of crime; laundered funds and properties attachable, provisional attachments confirmed; two accounts ...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6941 to 6960 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Whether the issuing authority had jurisdiction to serve the impugned show-cause notice under s.74 CGST/MGST, given paragraph 2 of Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) was declared ultra vires; court applied principles from the Supreme Court's Kusum Ingots decision on pan-India applicability to frame this as the primary jurisdictional issue - respondents ordered to file a reply affidavit within two weeks addressing whether respondent-authority possessed jurisdiction to issue the SCN, with matter listed for further hearing on the stated date. - HC
Whether the issuing authority had jurisdiction to serve the impugned show-cause notice under s.74 CGST/MGST, given paragraph 2 of Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) was declared ultra vires; court applied principles from the Supreme Court's Kusum Ingots decision on pan-India applicability to frame this as the primary jurisdictional issue - respondents ordered to file a reply affidavit within two weeks addressing whether respondent-authority possessed jurisdiction to issue the SCN, with matter listed for further hearing on the stated date. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
