Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Whether the issuing authority had jurisdiction to serve the impugned show-cause notice under s.74 CGST/MGST, given paragraph 2 of Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) was declared ultra vires; court applied principles from the Supreme Court's Kusum Ingots decision on pan-India applicability to frame this as the primary jurisdictional issue - respondents ordered to file a reply affidavit within two weeks addressing whether respondent-authority possessed jurisdiction to issue the SCN, with matter listed for further hearing on the stated date. - HC
Whether the issuing authority had jurisdiction to serve the impugned show-cause notice under s.74 CGST/MGST, given paragraph 2 of Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) was declared ultra vires; court applied principles from the Supreme Court's Kusum Ingots decision on pan-India applicability to frame this as the primary jurisdictional issue - respondents ordered to file a reply affidavit within two weeks addressing whether respondent-authority possessed jurisdiction to issue the SCN, with matter listed for further hearing on the stated date. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
