Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6741 to 6760 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Whether interest on enhanced compensation is taxable or exempt: Holding that plain language of s.56(2)(viii) read with s.145B(1) brings interest on enhanced compensation under "income from other sources," and s.10(37) covers only compensation (not interest); outcome-interest is exigible to tax and exemption claim fails. Whether revision u/s 263 was justified: PCIT found AO failed to make requisite statutory and judicial inquiries (including jurisdictional HC precedents), rendering the assessment erroneous and prejudicial; outcome-revision u/s 263 was valid and recomputation under s.56(2)(viii) r.w.s.145B(1) with s.57(iv) deduction affirmed. - ITAT
Whether interest on enhanced compensation is taxable or exempt: Holding that plain language of s.56(2)(viii) read with s.145B(1) brings interest on enhanced compensation under "income from other sources," and s.10(37) covers only compensation (not interest); outcome-interest is exigible to tax and exemption claim fails. Whether revision u/s 263 was justified: PCIT found AO failed to make requisite statutory and judicial inquiries (including jurisdictional HC precedents), rendering the assessment erroneous and prejudicial; outcome-revision u/s 263 was valid and recomputation under s.56(2)(viii) r.w.s.145B(1) with s.57(iv) deduction affirmed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.