<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Interest on enhanced compensation held taxable u/s56(2)(viii) read with s.145B(1); s.10(37) exemption denied, revision u/s263 upheld</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96185</link>
    <description>Whether interest on enhanced compensation is taxable or exempt: Holding that plain language of s.56(2)(viii) read with s.145B(1) brings interest on enhanced compensation under &quot;income from other sources,&quot; and s.10(37) covers only compensation (not interest); outcome-interest is exigible to tax and exemption claim fails. Whether revision u/s 263 was justified: PCIT found AO failed to make requisite statutory and judicial inquiries (including jurisdictional HC precedents), rendering the assessment erroneous and prejudicial; outcome-revision u/s 263 was valid and recomputation under s.56(2)(viii) r.w.s.145B(1) with s.57(iv) deduction affirmed. - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 06:31:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 06:31:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Interest on enhanced compensation held taxable u/s56(2)(viii) read with s.145B(1); s.10(37) exemption denied, revision u/s263 upheld</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96185</link>
      <description>Whether interest on enhanced compensation is taxable or exempt: Holding that plain language of s.56(2)(viii) read with s.145B(1) brings interest on enhanced compensation under &quot;income from other sources,&quot; and s.10(37) covers only compensation (not interest); outcome-interest is exigible to tax and exemption claim fails. Whether revision u/s 263 was justified: PCIT found AO failed to make requisite statutory and judicial inquiries (including jurisdictional HC precedents), rendering the assessment erroneous and prejudicial; outcome-revision u/s 263 was valid and recomputation under s.56(2)(viii) r.w.s.145B(1) with s.57(iv) deduction affirmed. - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 06:31:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>