Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
The sole issue was entitlement to anticipatory (pre-arrest) bail where authorities allege operation of fictitious firms, issuance of fake invoices and fraudulent availment/circulation of ineligible input tax credit. Relying on ongoing nascent inquiry under notice provisions and the court's inherent jurisdiction, the High Court found specific and serious allegations, non-cooperation with investigation, risk of custodial interrogation being frustrated, tampering with evidence and influencing witnesses; consequently the petition for pre-arrest bail was dismissed. - HC
The sole issue was entitlement to anticipatory (pre-arrest) bail where authorities allege operation of fictitious firms, issuance of fake invoices and fraudulent availment/circulation of ineligible input tax credit. Relying on ongoing nascent inquiry under notice provisions and the court's inherent jurisdiction, the High Court found specific and serious allegations, non-cooperation with investigation, risk of custodial interrogation being frustrated, tampering with evidence and influencing witnesses; consequently the petition for pre-arrest bail was dismissed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
