<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Alleged GST fraud through fictitious firms and fake invoices leading to denial of anticipatory (pre-arrest) bail</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96156</link>
    <description>The sole issue was entitlement to anticipatory (pre-arrest) bail where authorities allege operation of fictitious firms, issuance of fake invoices and fraudulent availment/circulation of ineligible input tax credit. Relying on ongoing nascent inquiry under notice provisions and the court&#039;s inherent jurisdiction, the High Court found specific and serious allegations, non-cooperation with investigation, risk of custodial interrogation being frustrated, tampering with evidence and influencing witnesses; consequently the petition for pre-arrest bail was dismissed. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:36:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:36:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Alleged GST fraud through fictitious firms and fake invoices leading to denial of anticipatory (pre-arrest) bail</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96156</link>
      <description>The sole issue was entitlement to anticipatory (pre-arrest) bail where authorities allege operation of fictitious firms, issuance of fake invoices and fraudulent availment/circulation of ineligible input tax credit. Relying on ongoing nascent inquiry under notice provisions and the court&#039;s inherent jurisdiction, the High Court found specific and serious allegations, non-cooperation with investigation, risk of custodial interrogation being frustrated, tampering with evidence and influencing witnesses; consequently the petition for pre-arrest bail was dismissed. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:36:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>